Abstract : Flipped classrooms also redefine as inverted classroom. This kind of teaching comprehend in which task are given to the students to study at home from books and practice concepts through assignments. Through the Inverted classrooms teachers set target for their courses, learning for class in advance, choose high quality class, and helpful information collection upload on websites which also help in reducing paperwork which also helps in reducing the paperwork. The flipped classrooms are shifting from Passive learning to active learning state i.e., from traditional learning classroom teaching to flipped classrooms. In traditional classrooms students receives limited amount of time but on the other hand in flipped classrooms student get extra time and as they can learn through lecture videos also. It applies competency - based learning in which student becomes master of one topic before moving on to another topic. Flipped learning is a strategy in which teachers record their lectures and post those videos on online, which student can access. Students study at home by watching these videos and when they come to class, they let's get ready with that lecture. To improve the existing problems in the quality of teaching process this paper conducts descriptive research on Inverted classroom and to find out the problems faced ion traditional classroom teaching method.
Keywords : Face to face teaching; Higher education; Flipped classroom; scoping review.
Cite : Garg, P., Pandey, A., & Pandey, S. (2024). Analysis Of Future Trends In Flipped Classroom And Mathematical Correlation With Traditional Classroom (1st ed., pp. 164-176). Noble Science Press. https://doi.org/10.52458/9788197112492.nsp.2024.eb.ch-17
References :
Cashin, W. E. (1985). Improving lectures. Idea paper no. 14. Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6.
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College teaching, 41(1), 30–35.
Borg, M., & Shapiro, S. (1996). Personality Type and Student Performance in Principles of Economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 27(1), 3-25.
Windschitl, M. (1999). Using small-group discussions in science lectures. College Teaching, 47(1), 23–7.
Rosie, A. (2000). “Deep learning”: a dialectical approach drawing on tutor-led web resources. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 45–59
Lage, M., & Platt, G. (2000). The Internet and the Inverted Classroom. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 11-1
Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212–218.
H. G. Willet, ?Not one or the other but both: Hybrid course delivery using WebCT,?The Electronic Library, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 413-419, 2002.
Williams, C. (2002). Learning On-line: A review of recent literature in a rapidly expanding field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(3), 263-272.
T. Boyle, C. Bradley, P. Chalk, Jones, and P. Pickard, ?Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program,? Journal of Educational Media, vol. 28, no. 2–3, pp. 165?178, 2003
Huxham, M. (2005). Learning in lectures Do ‘interactive windows’ help? Active learning in higher education, 6(1), 17–31.
Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30.
Beekes, W. (2006). The “millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 25–36.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.
Young, M. S., Robinson, S., & Alberts, P. (2009). Students pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 41–55.
Z. Akyol and D. R. Garrison, ?Community of inquiry in adult online Learning: Collaborative- constructivist approaches, ? in T. T. Kidd, (Ed.), Adult Learning in the Digital Age: Perspectives on Online Technologies and Outcomes (Ch.VI), Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009.
Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2009). Student motivation and engagement in learning. In proceedings of the 32nd HERDSA annual conference, the student experience, Darwin, 6-9 July 2009 (pp. 529–538).
M. Ronchetti, ?Using video lectures to make teaching more interactive,? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), June 2010.
G. Topp, ?Flipped classrooms take advantage of technology, ?USA Today, Oct. 6, 2011.
Flipping the classroom, The Economist, Sep. 17, 2011.
Z. Akyol, N. Vaughan, and D. R. Garrison, ?The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry, ?Interactive Learning Environments, 2011
D. Mehta, Video in the Class Keeps Savvy Students Engaged, Toronto: The Canadian Press, Sep. 8, 2011.
C. R. Tucker, Blended Learning in Grades 4–12: Leveraging the Power of Technology to Create Student-Centered Classrooms, SAGE, 2012.
T. Rosenberg, ?Turning education upside down,? New York Times, Oct. 9, 2013.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of theresearch. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom andinstructional technology integration in a college-level information systemsspreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development,61(4),563–580.
Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: an opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49.
Larson, S., & Yamamoto, J. (2013). Flipping the college spreadsheet skills classroom: initial empirical results. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 4(10), 751–758.
McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., Mumper, R. J. (2013).
Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), 196.
Poon, J. (2014). A cross-country comparison on the use of blended learning in property education.
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2014). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom:
Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
Property Management, 32(2), 154-175.
Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227236.
Butt, A. (2014). Student Views on the Use of A Flipped Classroom Approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33-43.
McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243.
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: new methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84.
Özyurt, Ö., & Özyurt, H. (2015). Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: Content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2014. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 349-358.
Bentihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2015). The evidencefor ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursingeducation. Nurse Education Today, 6, 15–21.
Elian, S. A. & Hamaidi, D. A. (2018). The Effect of using flipped classroom strategy on the academic achievement of fourth
Lin, C.J. & Hwang, G. J. (2018). A Learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral Performance in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205-219. grade students in Jordan. International journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2), 110-125.
Chen, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A Meta?analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 793-824.
Jdaitawi, M. (2019). The Effect of flipped classroom strategy on students learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 665-680.
Jian, Q. (2019). Effects of digital flipped classroom teaching method integrated cooperative learning model on learning motivation and outcome. The Electronic Library, 37(5), 842-859
Chang, C., Kao, C., & Hwang, G. (2020). Facilitating students’ critical thinking and decision making performances: A Flipped classroom for neonatal health care training. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 32–46.
Cheng, S., Hwang, G., & Lai, C. (2020). Critical research advancements of flipped learning: A Review of the top 100 highly cited papers. Interactive Learning Environments, doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1765395
Cheung, C. & Chen, Y. (2020). Implementing the flipped classroom approach in primary English classrooms in China. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1217-1235.
Djamàa, S. (2020). Lecture in the living room, homework in the classroom: The Effects of flipped instruction on graduate EFL students’ exam performance. Computers in the Schools, 37(3), 141-167.
