ROLE OF INDIAN GOVERNMENT AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP    

Authors : NEELIMA CHAUDHARY

Publishing Date : 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.52458/9789388996587.2023.eb.ch34

ISBN : 978-93-88996-58-7

Pages : 179

Chapter id : PART-2/NSP/ICAAR-2023/A-34

Abstract : India and the rest of the world are abuzz with talk of social entrepreneurship. People have considered the idea of generosity to be rather appealing. It has the best balance of social responsibility with enterprise, which makes it very alluring and special in its own right. According to experts, this idea also tackles social needs and social innovations as a whole; social entrepreneurship is nothing more than the identification of social needs and meeting those needs through a distinctive social innovation. Although social entrepreneurship is not a new idea, its posture has recently reached new heights. Corporates are now searching for their greater roles in contributing to society in ways that are both commercially and socially advantageous because the Indian government has made CSR more than just a formality. This essay discusses social entrepreneurship, how it emerged in India, examples of different social entrepreneurs there, and the government's and other institutions' roles in fostering it.

Keywords : Entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurs, Indian Government, social problems.

Cite : Chaudhary, N. (2023). Role of Indian Government and Other Institutions in Social Entrepreneurship (1st ed., pp. 179-183). Noble Science Press. https://doi.org/10.52458/9789388996587.2023.eb.ch34

References :
  1. Alter, S. K. (2006). Social enterprise models and their mission and money relationships. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change (pp. 205—232). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurs and societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260—282.
  3. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1—22.
  4. Davis, T. (1997, September 24). The NGO business hybrid: Is the private sector the answer? Paper presented at the CIVICUS World Assembly: Making money: Strategies for earning income session, Budapest, Hungary
  5. Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56—65.
  6. Roberts, D., & Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: The concept of social entrepreneurship. University of Auckland Business Review, 71(1), 45—51.
  7. Roper, J., & Cheney, G. (2005). Leadership, learning and human resource management: The means of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 95—104.
  8. Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418—434.
  9. Shepherd, D. A. (1999). Venture capitalists’ assessments of new venture survival. Management Science, 45(5), 621—632.
  10. Thompson, J. L. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 412—431.
  11. Thompson, J. L., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship: A new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(6), 328—338.
  12. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth vol. 3: Firm emergence and growth (pp. 119—138).
  13. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Young, R. (2006). For what it is worth: Social value and the future of social entrepreneurship. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change (pp. 56—73). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press