STUDYING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS STRATEGIES FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND PEACEBUILDING IN POST-CONFLICT SOCIETIES    

Authors : Dr. BEENA RANAWAT

Publishing Date : 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.52458/9789388996570.2023.eb.ch50

ISBN : 978-93-88996-58-7

Pages : 286-290

Chapter id : NSP/ICAAR-2023/A-50

Abstract : The present study investigates the efficacy of several approaches employed in conflict resolution and rebuilding within communities that have experienced violence. Following periods of deadly conflict, the imperative for establishing durable peace becomes paramount for nations. A comprehensive analysis of power-sharing agreements, disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) initiatives, transitional justice systems, and grassroots peacebuilding activities is presented in this paper. The report assesses various approaches according to their capacity to tackle the fundamental catalysts of conflict, facilitate reconciliation, and generate enduring stability. This article seeks to offer assistance to policymakers and practitioners in post-conflict situations by conducting a comprehensive literature analysis to analyze the strengths and limits of each strategy.

Keywords : Conflict Resolution, Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict Societies, Power-Sharing, DDR, Transitional Justice, Reconciliation

Cite :

References :
  1. Binder, S. A. (2003). Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Brookings Institution Press.
  2. Hayner, P. B. (2011). Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. Routledge.
  3. Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Demobilization and reintegration. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 531-567.
  4. Knight, M., & Ozerdem, A. (2004). Guns, camps, and cash: Disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion of former combatants in transitions from war to peace. Journal of Peace Research, 41(4), 499-516.
  5. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.
  6. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press.
  7. Mac Ginty, R. (2008). Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict, 43YoCooperation and Conflict, 43(2), 139-163.
  8. Moe, T. M., & Howell, W. G. (1999). The presidential power of unilateral action. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 132-179.
  9. Muggah, R. (2005). No magic bullet: A critical perspective on disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) and weapons reduction in post-conflict contexts. The Round Table, 94(379), 239-252.
  10. Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Roeder, P. G., & Rothchild, D. S. (2005). Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy After Civil Wars. Cornell University Press.
  12. Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), 5-44.
  13. Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press.